« Home | Hacking Windows 95, Part 2 » | Reversing Some C++ Io Operations » | Practical Dictionary Attack On IPsec IKE » | C++ Std::String Buffer Overflow And Integer Overflow » | 3069 hash passwords » | OWASP Blog Moved To Website » | Masad Clipper And Stealer - Windows Spyware Exfilt... » | Arris Cable Modem Backdoor - I'm A Technician, Tru... » | Learning Web Pentesting With DVWA Part 1: Installa... » | 2020-12-13 SUNBURST SolarWinds Backdoor Samples »

Vulcan DoS Vs Akamai

In the past I had to do several DoS security audits, with múltiples types of tests and intensities. Sometimes several DDoS protections were present like Akamai for static content, and Arbor for absorb part of the bandwith.

One consideration for the DoS/DDoS tools is that probably it will loss the control of the attacker host, and the tool at least has to be able to stop automatically with a timeout, but can also implement remote response checks.

In order to size the minimum mbps needed to flood a service or to retard the response in a significant amount of time, the attacker hosts need a bandwith limiter, that increments in a logarithmic way up to a limit agreed with the customer/isp/cpd.

There are DoS tools that doesn't have this timeouts, and bandwith limit based on mbps, for that reason I have to implement a LD_PRELOAD based solution: bwcontrol

Although there are several good tools for stressing web servers and web aplications like apache ab, or other common tools used for pen-testing, but I also wrote a fast web flooder in c++ named wflood.

As expected the most effective for taking down the web server are the slow-loris, slow-read and derivatives, few host were needed to DoS an online banking. 
Remote attacks to database and highly dynamic web content were discarded, that could be impacted for sure.

I did another tool in c++ for crafting massive tcp/udp/ip malformed packets, that impacted sometimes on load balancers and firewalls, it was vulcan, it freezed even the firewall client software.

The funny thing was that the common attacks against Akamai hosts, where ineffective, and so does the slow-loris family of attacks, because are common, and the Akamai nginx webservers are well tunned. But when tried vulcan, few intensity was enough to crash Akamai hosts.

Another attack vector for static sites was trying to locate the IP of the customer instead of Akamai, if the customer doesn't use the Akamai Shadow service, it's possible to perform a HTTP Host header scan, and direct the attack to that host bypassing Akamai.

And what about Arbor protection? is good for reducing the flood but there are other kind of attacks, and this protection use to be disabled by default and in local holidays can be a mess.

Related news


Posted by K. Lianne on Sunday, January 21, 2024 at 12:11 AM |

Post a Comment

Search


Previous posts

Archives

Links

Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by Blogger
& Blogger Templates